Confidential Computing vs Traditional Security: What’s the Difference?

Meta Description: Learn how confidential computing differs from traditional security methods like encryption at rest and in transit. Discover why protecting data in use matters and when to use confidential computing.

Target Keywords: confidential computing vs traditional security, data in use encryption, confidential computing difference, TEE vs encryption, hardware security vs software security

Reading Time: 13 minutes

TL;DR - Confidential Computing vs Traditional Security

Traditional security protects data at rest (stored on disk) and in transit (moving across networks) using encryption, but leaves data vulnerable while being processed (in use). Confidential computing closes this gap by using hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to encrypt data even during active computation, protecting it from administrators, cloud providers, and infrastructure-level attacks.

Key Differences:

• Traditional Security: Relies on perimeter defenses, access controls, and trust in administrators
• Confidential Computing: Assumes breach; protects data even from privileged users using hardware isolation
• Traditional: Encrypts data at rest (AES disk encryption) and in transit (TLS/SSL)
• Confidential: Also encrypts data in use (CPU/GPU memory encryption)
• Traditional: Software-based controls can be bypassed by admins or malware
• Confidential: Hardware-enforced isolation cannot be bypassed without physical CPU tampering

The Three States of Data

To understand the difference, we need to recognize that data exists in three states:

1. Data at Rest (Stored Data)

Definition: Data stored on persistent media—hard drives, SSDs, databases, backups, archives.

Traditional Security Approach:

• Encryption: AES-256 encryption for files, databases, backups
• Access Control: File permissions, database authentication
• Physical Security: Lock servers in secure data centers
• Key Management: Store encryption keys in vaults or HSMs (Hardware Security Modules)

Examples:

• Encrypted hard drives (BitLocker, LUKS, FileVault)
• Database encryption (SQL Server TDE, PostgreSQL pgcrypto)
• Cloud storage encryption (AWS S3 encryption, Azure Storage encryption)

Vulnerability: When data is read from storage to be used, it must be decrypted into memory—where traditional security stops protecting it.

2. Data in Transit (Moving Data)

Definition: Data moving between systems—over the internet, internal networks, or between services.

Traditional Security Approach:

• Encryption Protocols: TLS/SSL for web traffic, IPsec for VPNs, SSH for remote access
• Network Segmentation: VLANs, firewalls, DMZs to isolate sensitive traffic
• Certificate Management: PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) to verify endpoints
• Intrusion Detection: Monitor network traffic for anomalies

Examples:

• HTTPS for websites (TLS 1.3)
• VPNs for remote workers (WireGuard, OpenVPN)
• Service-to-service encryption (mTLS in microservices)

Vulnerability: Once data arrives at the destination server and is loaded into memory for processing, encryption is removed—again leaving it exposed.

3. Data in Use (Active Processing)

Definition: Data actively being processed by CPU/GPU—in RAM, CPU caches, processor registers.

Traditional Security Approach:

• Access Control: User authentication, authorization checks
• OS-Level Isolation: Virtual machines, containers, process sandboxing
• Administrator Trust: Assume system administrators and cloud providers won’t abuse access
• Audit Logs: Track who accessed what (after the fact)

Critical Vulnerability: In traditional systems, data in use is in plaintext in memory. Anyone with privileged access (root, admin, hypervisor) can read it:

• Cloud administrators can snapshot VM memory
• Malicious insiders with elevated privileges can dump processes
• Malware with root access can scan all memory
• Physical attackers can cold-boot servers and extract memory contents

This is where confidential computing comes in.

How Traditional Security Works

Defense in Depth (Layered Security)

Traditional security relies on multiple layers of protection:

Assumption: If attackers breach one layer, others will stop them.

Reality: Privileged users (admins, cloud providers) can bypass all layers. Once inside, they can access data in memory.

Trust-Based Model

Traditional security fundamentally relies on trust:

• You trust your IT administrators not to abuse access
• You trust your cloud provider’s employees
• You trust that your access control policies are correctly enforced
• You trust that your software doesn’t have vulnerabilities

Problem in Modern Computing:

• Multi-tenant clouds mean your data shares hardware with competitors
• Cloud administrators you’ve never met can access your VMs
• Regulatory bodies (NSA, government agencies) can compel cloud providers to hand over data
• Insider threats are responsible for 34% of data breaches (Verizon DBIR 2023)

How Confidential Computing Works

Zero-Trust Hardware Enforcement

Confidential computing flips the trust model using hardware-based isolation:

Core Principle: Don’t trust anyone except the CPU/GPU hardware. Use cryptographic attestation to verify the hardware is genuine and uncompromised.

Hardware-Based Protection Mechanisms

Confidential computing relies on CPU/GPU features:

1. Memory Encryption

Technology: AES encryption engine built into the CPU memory controller

How It Works:

• Each protected workload (VM, enclave, container) gets a unique encryption key
• Data is encrypted when written to RAM and decrypted when read into CPU
• Hypervisor and operating system see only ciphertext
• Keys are managed by a hardware security processor (AMD PSP, Intel CSME) never exposed to software

2. Isolated Execution

Technologies:

• Intel SGX: Application enclaves within a process
• AMD SEV-SNP: Encrypted virtual machines
• Intel TDX: Trust Domains (secure VMs)
• ARM CCA: Confidential Realms

How It Works:

• Hardware enforces boundaries that software cannot cross
• Even the hypervisor cannot inspect or modify protected memory
• Attempts to access protected regions return encrypted garbage or trigger security exceptions

3. Remote Attestation

The Problem: How do you know you’re sending data to a genuine TEE and not a fake one?

The Solution - Attestation:

1. The TEE generates a report containing:

• Measurements (cryptographic hashes) of the code running inside
• Hardware proof-of-origin (signature from CPU vendor)
• Freshness nonce to prevent replay attacks

1. You verify the report’s signature using the CPU vendor’s public key (AMD, Intel, ARM, NVIDIA)
2. You check that measurements match expected values (correct OS, app version, configuration)
3. Only after successful verification do you send sensitive data

Verification Process:

1. Request attestation report from the confidential VM endpoint
2. Verify report signature using hardware vendor’s public key (AMD/Intel/ARM/NVIDIA)
3. Compare measurements in report against expected hash values
4. If signature valid AND measurements match: Proceed to send sensitive data
5. If verification fails at any step: Reject connection with security error

Security Outcomes:

• ✅ Valid attestation: VM running on genuine hardware with expected software → Safe to proceed
• ❌ Signature mismatch: Not running on genuine hardware → Reject connection
• ❌ Measurement mismatch: VM running unexpected code (compromised) → Reject connection

This is cryptographic proof that your data will be protected—not just a promise or policy.

Confidential Computing vs Traditional Security: Head-to-Head Comparison

When Traditional Security Is Sufficient

Confidential computing is powerful but not always necessary. Use traditional security when:

1. You Fully Trust Your Environment

Scenario: On-premises data center with vetted, trusted staff

Why Traditional Works:

• You control physical access
• You hire and monitor your administrators
• Insider threat risk is acceptable

Example: A small company’s internal CRM running on servers in a locked room, managed by a single trusted IT person.

2. Data Sensitivity Is Low

Scenario: Public data, non-confidential information

Why Traditional Works:

• Even if data is exposed, there’s no harm
• Compliance doesn’t require hardware-level protection

Example: A public-facing blog’s web server. Encryption in transit (HTTPS) is enough; no need for confidential computing.

3. Performance Is Critical

Scenario: High-frequency trading, real-time gaming, latency-sensitive applications

Why Traditional Works:

• Confidential computing’s 2-15% overhead might be unacceptable
• Data is less sensitive than speed

Example: A stock exchange matching engine that prioritizes microsecond latency over data protection (trades are public anyway).

4. Compliance Doesn’t Require It

Scenario: Basic compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001) that accepts trust-based controls

Why Traditional Works:

• Many frameworks don’t yet mandate hardware-based protection
• Audit logs and access controls satisfy requirements

Example: A SaaS company hosting non-medical, non-financial data that passes SOC 2 audits with standard cloud security.

When Confidential Computing Is Essential

Use confidential computing when traditional security’s trust assumptions are unacceptable:

1. Regulated Industries (Healthcare, Finance, Government)

Challenge: HIPAA, PCI-DSS, FedRAMP, GDPR require strict data protection, including from privileged users

Why Confidential Computing:

• Cryptographic proof of data protection (attestation logs)
• Compliance auditors can verify data never left TEEs
• Eliminates “trusted insider” risk

Example: A hospital using Google Cloud to analyze patient records. With confidential computing, Google administrators cannot access patient data—satisfying HIPAA’s “minimum necessary” access rule cryptographically, not just via policy.

2. Multi-Tenant Cloud & SaaS

Challenge: Customers don’t trust cloud providers or SaaS vendors with their sensitive data

Why Confidential Computing:

• Hardware isolation guarantees no cross-tenant data leakage
• SaaS vendors can prove they cannot access customer data
• Enables serving highly regulated customers (banks, hospitals)

Example: A data analytics SaaS platform uses confidential VMs so that each customer’s queries run in hardware-isolated environments. Even the SaaS company’s own engineers cannot see customer data.

3. Intellectual Property Protection

Challenge: Running proprietary AI models or algorithms in the cloud risks IP theft

Why Confidential Computing:

• Model weights remain encrypted during inference
• Cloud providers cannot extract algorithms
• Cryptographic proof that IP never left the TEE

Example: A pharmaceutical company runs drug discovery AI models on Azure confidential VMs. Even Microsoft cannot access the proprietary molecular simulation code.

4. Collaborative Computing (Multi-Party)

Challenge: Multiple organizations want to jointly analyze data but don’t trust each other

Why Confidential Computing:

• Data from all parties is encrypted in a shared TEE
• TEE runs approved code; no party can see others’ raw data
• Only aggregated results are released

Example: Three banks want to train a fraud detection model on combined transaction data. Using a confidential computing platform:

• Each bank sends encrypted data to a TEE
• TEE runs the approved training code
• Only the trained model is released; no bank sees others’ transactions

5. Sovereign Clouds & Data Residency

Challenge: Governments require data stay within national borders and not be accessible to foreign entities—including foreign cloud providers

Why Confidential Computing:

• Data encrypted with customer-controlled keys
• Cloud provider (even if foreign) cannot decrypt
• Attestation proves data usage complies with regulations

Example: A European government agency uses AWS in the EU region with confidential computing. Even though AWS is a US company, cryptographic guarantees ensure US employees cannot access EU citizen data—satisfying GDPR sovereignty requirements.

Real-World Attack Scenarios: Traditional vs Confidential

Scenario 1: Malicious Cloud Administrator

Attack: A cloud provider employee with hypervisor access wants to steal data from a VM.

Traditional Security Response:

• ❌ Fails: Admin uses hypervisor tools to snapshot VM memory, extracting plaintext data, database passwords, API keys
• Mitigation: Audit logs detect the access (after the fact), admin is fired, but data is already stolen

Confidential Computing Response:

• ✅ Succeeds: Admin attempts to snapshot the VM but gets only encrypted memory
• Mitigation: Not needed—attack is prevented at the hardware level

Outcome: Confidential computing prevents the attack entirely.

Scenario 2: Physical Data Center Breach

Attack: An attacker gains physical access to the data center and attempts a cold boot attack (freezing RAM to extract data).

Traditional Security Response:

• ❌ Fails: Attacker removes RAM modules, freezes them with liquid nitrogen, and reads residual data including encryption keys
• Mitigation: Physical security failed; data is lost

Confidential Computing Response:

• ✅ Succeeds: Encryption keys are stored in the CPU’s hardware security module, never in RAM
• Attack Fails: Even with physical access to RAM, attacker gets only ciphertext; keys are destroyed on power loss

Outcome: Confidential computing protects against physical attacks.

Scenario 3: Compromised Hypervisor (Software Vulnerability)

Attack: A zero-day vulnerability in the hypervisor allows an attacker to gain control.

Traditional Security Response:

• ❌ Fails: Attacker uses hypervisor access to read VM memory, inject malicious code, or modify application behavior
• Mitigation: Patch hypervisor quickly, but VMs may already be compromised

Confidential Computing Response:

• ✅ Succeeds: Even with full hypervisor control, attacker cannot decrypt VM memory or inject code into the TEE
• Attack Limited: Attacker can only disrupt service (DoS), not steal data

Outcome: Confidential computing limits damage from infrastructure compromise.

Scenario 4: Insider Threat - Database Admin

Attack: A database administrator with root access to the database server wants to sell customer data.

Traditional Security Response:

• ❌ Fails: Admin has legitimate access to the database; queries and exports customer records
• Mitigation: Audit logs show excessive access (after data is stolen), admin is prosecuted, but data is on the dark web

Confidential Computing Response:

• ✅ Succeeds (if deployed correctly): Database runs in a confidential VM; admin connects via an API that enforces access controls
• TEE Configuration: Only authorized queries (e.g., aggregated reports, not full dumps) are allowed; raw data never leaves the TEE
• Attack Fails: Admin tries to SSH into the server, but TEE attestation blocks unauthorized access

Outcome: Confidential computing enforces technical controls that admins cannot bypass.

Hybrid Approach: Combining Traditional and Confidential Security

Best practice is defense in depth using both traditional and confidential computing:

Layer 1: Traditional Perimeter Security

• Firewalls, IDS/IPS, network segmentation
• Prevent unauthorized access to your infrastructure

Layer 2: Traditional Encryption (At Rest & In Transit)

• TLS for network traffic
• Disk encryption for storage
• Protect data when not actively being processed

Layer 3: Traditional Access Controls

• Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
• Role-based access control (RBAC)
• Principle of least privilege

Layer 4: Confidential Computing (In Use)

• TEEs for data in active processing
• Hardware-enforced isolation
• Attestation for verification

Example Architecture: Secure Healthcare Data Platform

Traditional Security Layers:

1. Perimeter: Firewall allows only HTTPS (port 443) and blocks all other traffic
2. Network: VPN required for admin access; patient data network is segmented from admin network
3. Authentication: Doctors use MFA (password + hardware token) to access patient records
4. Encryption: Patient records encrypted at rest (AES-256 disk encryption)
5. Audit: All database queries logged for HIPAA compliance

Confidential Computing Layer:

1. Data in Use: When a doctor queries patient records, the database runs in an AMD SEV-SNP confidential VM

• Patient data is decrypted only inside the TEE
• Cloud provider (AWS, Azure) cannot access patient records even if they wanted to
• Attestation report proves to auditors that data never left the TEE

Result: Even if an attacker bypasses all traditional layers (stolen credentials, insider threat, cloud provider subpoena), they still cannot access patient data in memory due to confidential computing.

Limitations of Confidential Computing

Confidential computing is not a silver bullet:

1. Application-Level Vulnerabilities

Problem: Bugs in your code can still leak data

Example: A SQL injection vulnerability in your app allows attackers to query the database

• Confidential computing protects data in the database’s memory
• But: If your app has a vulnerability, attackers can use your app to access data (same as traditional security)

Mitigation: Use secure coding practices, input validation, and automated security testing

2. Side-Channel Attacks

Problem: Academic attacks (Spectre, Meltdown, cache timing attacks) may leak small amounts of data

Reality:

• Modern TEEs include hardware mitigations (AMD SNP, Intel TDX have protections)
• Attacks are difficult to execute in practice
• Risk is much lower than trusting administrators

Mitigation: Keep CPU firmware updated; use latest TEE generations with improved mitigations

3. Supply Chain Risks

Problem: You must trust the CPU vendor (AMD, Intel, ARM, NVIDIA)

Reality:

• If the CPU vendor is malicious, they could design backdoors
• However, major vendors are highly scrutinized; backdoors would destroy their business
• Risk is lower than trusting thousands of cloud admins and third parties

Mitigation: Use reputable CPU vendors; consider multi-vendor strategies for highest assurance

4. Complexity & Learning Curve

Problem: Confidential computing requires new skills

Example: Implementing attestation, managing TEE configurations, debugging encrypted environments

Mitigation: Use managed services (Google Confidential VMs, Azure Confidential Computing, Phala Cloud) that handle complexity

The Future: Confidential by Default

The industry is moving toward confidential computing as the default:

Trends

1. Universal TEE Support:

• All major CPUs (AMD, Intel, ARM) now include TEE features
• Next-gen GPUs (NVIDIA H200, AMD Instinct) have confidential computing modes
• Future: Every cloud VM will be confidential by default

2. Zero-Trust Architectures:

• Governments mandating zero-trust (US Executive Order 14028)
• Enterprises adopting “never trust, always verify”
• Confidential computing is the technical enforcement of zero-trust for data in use

3. Regulatory Requirements:

• EU’s upcoming AI Act may require confidential AI for sensitive use cases
• HIPAA and PCI-DSS evolving to prefer hardware-based protections
• Cyber insurance requiring confidential computing for lower premiums

4. Performance Improvements:

• Each CPU generation reduces encryption overhead (now 2-10%, target <2%)
• Dedicated AI accelerators (TPUs, NPUs) integrating TEE support natively
• Future: Negligible performance cost

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is confidential computing a replacement for traditional security?

No, it’s a complement. Confidential computing addresses a specific gap—protecting data in use—that traditional security doesn’t solve. You still need firewalls, access controls, encryption at rest/transit, and all other traditional security measures. Confidential computing adds a critical layer on top.

Do I need to rewrite my applications for confidential computing?

Usually, no. Confidential VMs and containers run standard applications without modification. The main change is implementing attestation in client applications that send data to the TEE—typically a few lines of code to verify the TEE’s integrity before transmitting sensitive data.

Is confidential computing slower than traditional computing?

Yes, but only slightly. Hardware-based memory encryption adds 2-15% overhead depending on the workload (memory-intensive tasks see higher impact). For most applications, this is an acceptable trade-off for significantly improved security.

Can administrators still manage confidential VMs?

Yes, but with restrictions. Administrators can:

• Start/stop VMs
• Allocate resources (CPU, memory, storage)
• Monitor performance metrics
• Apply updates (with re-attestation required)

They cannot:

• Read VM memory contents
• Inject code into the VM
• Modify VM state without detection

How do I verify that confidential computing is actually working?

Use remote attestation. Request a cryptographic report from the TEE that proves:

1. It’s running on genuine hardware (AMD SEV, Intel TDX, etc.)
2. The software inside matches expected measurements (correct OS, app, config)
3. No tampering has occurred

Cloud providers offer attestation services (Google Cloud Attestation, Azure Attestation, Phala attestation SDK) to simplify this.

What happens if there’s a hardware bug in the TEE?

CPU vendors (AMD, Intel, NVIDIA) release microcode updates and security advisories. Best practices:

• Subscribe to vendor security bulletins
• Apply firmware updates promptly
• Use defense-in-depth (don’t rely solely on TEEs)

Historically, TEE vulnerabilities are rare and quickly patched. The risk is far lower than trusting software-only security.

Conclusion: Which Security Model Should You Use?

Use Traditional Security When:

• You fully trust your environment and administrators
• Data sensitivity is low
• Compliance doesn’t require hardware-based protection
• Performance overhead is unacceptable

Add Confidential Computing When:

• You handle sensitive data (healthcare, finance, PII)
• You use multi-tenant clouds or SaaS platforms
• You need to comply with strict regulations (HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP)
• You want to eliminate insider threat risk
• You need cryptographic proof of data protection

The Bottom Line: Traditional security protects against external attackers. Confidential computing also protects against privileged insiders, cloud providers, and infrastructure compromise. As threats evolve and regulations tighten, confidential computing is becoming essential, not optional.

Related Resources

• Phala Homepage
• Learning Hub
• Phala Cloud Documentation
• Dstack Documentation
• Success Stories

Next Steps

• Get Started with Phala Cloud
• Deploy Your First Confidential VM
• Explore Confidential AI
• Join Our Startup Program
• Contact Us