
Confidential Computing Cloud Comparison: Phala vs AWS vs Azure vs GCP
TL;DR: Confidential computing is available across major cloud providers, but implementations vary widely.
- Phala Cloud — Provides zero-trust TEE infrastructure with Intel TDX, AMD SEV-SNP, and NVIDIA H100/H200 GPU TEE support. Features include public attestation, Dstack SDK, and multi-TEE compatibility for AI workloads.
- AWS Nitro Enclaves — Offers secure enclaves but still requires trust in AWS, with limited transparency and no GPU TEE.
- Azure Confidential Computing — Offers comprehensive TEE support, with Azure Attestation service for verification.
- GCP Confidential VMs — Provides AMD SEV encryption but offers limited attestation visibility and no GPU support yet.
This guide compares security models, TEE support, attestation methods, pricing, and use cases to help you choose the right platform.
Introduction
The confidential computing landscape has evolved from niche technology to mainstream cloud offerings. All major providers now support some form of hardware-protected execution, but the devil is in the details: trust models, attestation transparency, TEE technology support, and pricing structures vary dramatically.
This comprehensive comparison analyzes Phala Cloud, AWS, Azure, and GCP across the dimensions that matter for production confidential AI: security model, TEE hardware support, attestation and verification, developer experience, performance, pricing, and compliance. You’ll learn which platform best fits your requirements and how to navigate the tradeoffs.
What you’ll learn:
- Security model comparison (zero-trust vs. trusted provider)
- TEE technology support (TDX, SEV-SNP, Nitro, SGX)
- Attestation transparency and verification
- GPU TEE support for confidential AI
- Pricing and total cost of ownership
- Migration strategies and multi-cloud patterns
Quick Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Phala Cloud | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Trust Model | Zero-trust (don’t trust Phala) | Trust AWS | Trust Microsoft | Trust Google |
| CPU TEE | Intel TDX, AMD SEV-SNP | AWS Nitro Enclaves | Intel TDX, AMD SEV-SNP, Intel SGX | AMD SEV |
| GPU TEE | NVIDIA H100/H200 ✅ | ❌ Not available | ❌ Not available | ❌ Not available |
| Public Attestation | ✅ Trust Center | ⚠️ Limited | ✅ Azure Attestation | ⚠️ Limited |
| Open Source SDK | ✅ Dstack SDK | ❌ Proprietary | ⚠️ Hybrid | ❌ Proprietary |
| Attestation Transparency | ✅ Fully public | ❌ Opaque | ⚠️ Partial | ❌ Opaque |
| Docker Support | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Modified images | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| K8s Support | ✅ TEE-aware | ⚠️ EKS limited | ✅ AKS native | ⚠️ GKE limited |
| Pricing Transparency | ✅ Public | ✅ Public | ✅ Public | ✅ Public |
| Confidential AI Focus | ✅ Primary use case | ⚠️ General purpose | ⚠️ General purpose | ⚠️ General purpose |
Phala Cloud: Zero-Trust Confidential Computing
Architecture and Trust Model
Core principle: Don’t trust any provider, including Phala.
TEE Technology Support
- CPU TEE:
- ✅ Intel TDX (Trust Domain Extensions) - VM-level isolation
- ✅ AMD SEV-SNP (Secure Encrypted Virtualization) - VM-level encryption
- ✅ Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions) - Process-level enclaves
- GPU TEE (Unique to Phala):
- ✅ NVIDIA H100 Confidential Computing
- ✅ NVIDIA H200 Confidential Computing
- Performance: 95-99% of native (minimal overhead)
Attestation and Verification
Phala Trust Center:
- Public attestation repository: trust-center.phala.network
- Every deployment gets public attestation URL
- Open source verification tools
- Real-time continuous attestation (5-minute intervals)
Attestation includes:
- Hardware measurements (proving genuine TEE)
- Code hash (Docker image SHA256)
- Configuration hash (environment variables)
- Dstack version
- Timestamp and nonce (freshness)
Client verification:
from phala_trust_center import verify_attestation
result = verify_attestation(
url="https://trust-center.phala.network/attestations/abc123",
expected_code_hash="sha256:def456..."
)
if result.valid:
print(f"✓ Running in genuine {result.tee_type}")
print(f"✓ Code matches expected hash")
# Safe to send sensitive dataDeveloper Experience
Deployment (Docker to TEE):
# 1. Build standard Docker image
docker build -t my-ai-app:v1 .
# 2. Deploy to Phala Cloud with Dstack
dstack deploy \
--image my-ai-app:v1 \
--tee-type tdx \
--gpu h100 \
--phala-cloudPricing (as of Q1 2025):
| Resource | Phala Cloud | Notes |
| Intel TDX vCPU | $0.06/hour | 16GB RAM included |
| AMD SEV-SNP vCPU | $0.05/hour | 16GB RAM included |
| NVIDIA H100 GPU (TEE) | $2.50/hour | 80GB HBM3 |
| Storage (encrypted) | $0.10/GB/month | Automatic encryption |
| Egress | $0.08/GB | First 1TB free |
| Attestation | Free | Unlimited |
Strengths and Limitations
✅ Strengths:
- Zero-trust security model (don’t trust Phala)
- Only provider with GPU TEE (H100/H200)
- Public attestation verification
- Open source Dstack SDK
- Purpose-built for confidential AI
- Best performance-to-cost ratio for AI workloads
⚠️ Limitations:
- Smaller ecosystem than AWS/Azure/GCP
- Fewer global regions (expanding)
- Newer platform (less enterprise tooling)
Best for:
- Confidential AI inference and training
- Zero-trust requirements
- GPU-accelerated confidential computing
- Projects requiring attestation transparency
AWS: Nitro Enclaves and Confidential Computing
Architecture and Trust Model
Core principle: Trust AWS as the provider.
TEE Technology Support
- AWS Nitro Enclaves:
- Custom AWS-designed TEE (not standard TDX/SEV-SNP)
- Isolated VM with CPU and memory allocation
- No persistent storage (security feature)
- Communication via vsock (virtual socket)
- No GPU TEE:
- Standard GPU instances available
- But no confidential computing protection for GPUs
- GPU memory not encrypted
Attestation and Verification
AWS Nitro Attestation:
- Attestation document signed by NitroTPM
- Includes: PCR values, enclave measurements, timestamp
- Verification requires AWS SDK
- Not publicly auditable (requires AWS account)
Attestation process:
import boto3
import json
# Get attestation document
attestation = get_attestation_document(
nonce=user_nonce,
public_key=user_public_key
)Developer Experience
Deployment:
# 1. Build enclave image (EIF format)
nitro-cli build-enclave \
--docker-uri my-app:latest \
--output-file my-app.eif
# 2. Launch parent EC2 instance
aws ec2 run-instances \
--instance-type m5.xlarge \
--enclave-options 'Enabled=true'
# 3. Run enclave from parent instance
nitro-cli run-enclave \
--eif-path my-app.eif \
--memory 4096 \
--cpu-count 2Pricing (as of Q1 2025):
| Resource | AWS Price | Notes |
| m6a.xlarge (Nitro) | $0.172/hour | 4 vCPU, 16GB RAM |
| Enclave allocation | +20-30% overhead | From parent instance |
| p4d.24xlarge (GPU) | $32.77/hour | A100 GPU (no TEE) |
| Storage (EBS) | $0.08/GB/month | Not accessible in enclave |
| Attestation | Free | Via AWS service |
Strengths and Limitations
✅ Strengths:
- Mature AWS ecosystem integration
- Wide global availability (all regions)
- Strong compliance certifications (FedRAMP, etc.)
- Integration with AWS KMS, IAM, CloudWatch
⚠️ Limitations:
- Must trust AWS (not zero-trust)
- No GPU TEE support
- Closed-source Nitro system
- Complex development workflow
- Limited attestation transparency
- No persistent storage in enclaves
Best for:
- AWS-native architectures
- Compliance-driven requirements (FedRAMP)
- Applications already on AWS
- Scenarios where trusting AWS is acceptable
Azure: Confidential Computing Platform
Architecture and Trust Model
Core principle: Trust Microsoft, but with more transparency than AWS.
TEE Technology Support
- CPU TEE:
- ✅ Intel TDX (DCesv5, ECesv5 series)
- ✅ AMD SEV-SNP (DCasv5, ECasv5 series)
- ✅ Intel SGX (DC-series v2/v3)
- No GPU TEE:
- NCads H100 v5 instances (H100 GPUs)
- But no confidential computing mode
- GPU memory not encrypted
Attestation and Verification
Azure Attestation:
- Public REST API for attestation verification
- Supports custom attestation policies
- JWT-based attestation tokens
- More transparent than AWS
Attestation example:
import httpx
# Get attestation token from VM
attestation_token = get_attestation_token_from_vm()
# Verify with Azure Attestation (publicly accessible)
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
response = await client.post(
"https://myattestation.attest.azure.net/attest/TdxVm",
json={"token": attestation_token}
)
attestation_result = response.json()Developer Experience
Deployment:
# 1. Create Confidential VM with Azure CLI
az vm create \
--resource-group myRG \
--name myConfidentialVM \
--image Ubuntu2204 \
--size Standard_DC4es_v5 \
--enable-secure-boot true \
--enable-vtpm true
# 2. SSH and deploy application
# 3. Configure attestation
az attestation create \
--name myAttestation \
--resource-group myRG \
--location eastusPricing (as of Q1 2025):
| Resource | Azure Price | Notes |
| Standard_DC4es_v5 (TDX) | $0.512/hour | 4 vCPU, 32GB RAM |
| Standard_DC8as_v5 (SEV-SNP) | $0.968/hour | 8 vCPU, 64GB RAM |
| Standard_NC40ads_H100_v5 | $4.14/hour | H100 GPU (no TEE) |
| Managed Disk | $0.048/GB/month | Standard SSD |
| Azure Attestation | $0.01/1K requests | First 100K free |
Strengths and Limitations
✅ Strengths:
- Broadest CPU TEE support (TDX, SEV-SNP, SGX)
- Standard VM experience (easier than AWS Nitro)
- Azure Attestation with public API
- Strong Azure ecosystem integration
- Good documentation and tooling
⚠️ Limitations:
- Must trust Microsoft
- No GPU TEE support
- Higher pricing than Phala Cloud
- Attestation still Microsoft-controlled
- Limited to Azure ecosystem
Best for:
- Azure-native architectures
- Organizations already on Azure
- Need for multiple TEE options (TDX/SEV-SNP/SGX)
- Standard VM workflows preferred
GCP: Confidential VMs
Architecture and Trust Model
Core principle: Trust Google, with minimal transparency.
TEE Technology Support
- CPU TEE:
- ✅ AMD SEV (N2D series)
- ⚠️ Limited to AMD SEV (no TDX, no SEV-SNP, no SGX)
- No GPU TEE:
- A100 and H100 instances available
- No confidential computing mode
Attestation and Verification
GCP Attestation:
- Shielded VM with vTPM
- Minimal public attestation API
- Least transparent among major clouds
- Difficult to verify independently
Limited attestation example:
from google.cloud import compute_v1
# Get integrity monitoring data
client = compute_v1.InstancesClient()
instance = client.get(project=project_id, zone=zone, instance=instance_name)Developer Experience
Deployment:
# Create Confidential VM
gcloud compute instances create my-confidential-vm \
--zone=us-central1-a \
--machine-type=n2d-standard-4 \
--confidential-compute \
--maintenance-policy=TERMINATEPricing (as of Q1 2025):
| Resource | GCP Price | Notes |
| n2d-standard-4 (Confidential) | $0.195/hour | 4 vCPU, 16GB RAM |
| n2d-standard-32 (Confidential) | $1.558/hour | 32 vCPU, 128GB RAM |
| a2-highgpu-1g (A100) | $3.67/hour | A100 GPU (no TEE) |
| Persistent Disk | $0.04/GB/month | Standard |
| Attestation | N/A | Minimal support |
Strengths and Limitations
✅ Strengths:
- Simple GCE VM workflow
- Good GCP ecosystem integration
- Competitive pricing for CPU
⚠️ Limitations:
- Must trust Google
- Only AMD SEV (no TDX, SEV-SNP, SGX)
- Minimal attestation support
- Least transparency of major clouds
- No GPU TEE
- Poor documentation for confidential computing
Best for:
- GCP-native architectures
- Simple confidential computing needs
- Cost-sensitive CPU workloads
- Scenarios where limited attestation is acceptable
Side-by-Side Comparison
Security Model Comparison
| Aspect | Phala Cloud | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Trust model | Zero-trust | Trust AWS | Trust Microsoft | Trust Google |
| Attestation transparency | ✅ Fully public | ❌ Limited | ⚠️ Partial | ❌ Minimal |
| Independent verification | ✅ Yes | ❌ Requires AWS account | ⚠️ Partially | ❌ No |
| Open source components | ✅ Dstack SDK | ❌ Proprietary | ⚠️ Some | ❌ Proprietary |
| Hardware diversity | TDX, SEV-SNP, H100 | Nitro only | TDX, SEV-SNP, SGX | SEV only |
Winner: Phala Cloud - Zero-trust model with full transparency.
TEE Technology Comparison
| TEE Type | Phala Cloud | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Intel TDX | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| AMD SEV-SNP | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ SEV only |
| Intel SGX | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| AWS Nitro | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| NVIDIA H100 TEE | ✅ Unique | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| NVIDIA H200 TEE | ✅ Unique | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Winner: Phala Cloud - Only GPU TEE support; Azure wins for CPU diversity.
Performance Comparison
CPU TEE Overhead:
| Provider | Technology | Overhead | Benchmark |
| Phala Cloud | Intel TDX | 2-5% | 95-98% of native |
| Phala Cloud | AMD SEV-SNP | 1-3% | 97-99% of native |
| AWS | Nitro Enclaves | 5-10% | 90-95% of native |
| Azure | Intel TDX | 2-5% | 95-98% of native |
| Azure | AMD SEV-SNP | 1-3% | 97-99% of native |
| GCP | AMD SEV | 2-4% | 96-98% of native |
GPU Performance (H100):
| Provider | TEE Mode | Performance | Notes |
| Phala Cloud | ✅ Enabled | 95-99% | Confidential computing mode |
| AWS | ❌ Not available | - | No GPU TEE |
| Azure | ❌ Not available | - | No GPU TEE |
| GCP | ❌ Not available | - | No GPU TEE |
Winner: Phala Cloud - Only GPU TEE option; CPU performance comparable to Azure.
Pricing Comparison (Confidential AI Workload)
Scenario: 4 vCPU, 16GB RAM + 1x H100 GPU (8 hours/day, 30 days)
| Provider | Configuration | Monthly Cost | Notes |
| Phala Cloud | TDX + H100 TEE | $612 | CPU: $14, GPU: $600 (TEE-protected) |
| AWS | m6a.xlarge + p4d (no TEE) | $8,097 | CPU: $124, GPU: $7,865, no GPU TEE |
| Azure | DC4es_v5 + H100 (no TEE) | $1,123 | CPU: $123, GPU: $995, no GPU TEE |
| GCP | n2d-standard-4 + A100 (no TEE) | $932 | CPU: $47, GPU: $883, no GPU TEE |
Winner: Phala Cloud - 92% cheaper than AWS, 45% cheaper than Azure, with GPU TEE protection.
Developer Experience Comparison
| Aspect | Phala Cloud | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Docker support | ✅ Native | ⚠️ EIF format | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Deployment complexity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Simple | ⭐⭐ Complex | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good |
| Learning curve | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
| Documentation | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Fair |
| Community support | Growing | Large | Large | Large |
Winner: Tie - Phala Cloud simplest; AWS/Azure/GCP have larger ecosystems.
Use Case Recommendations
Confidential AI Inference
Recommended: [Phala Cloud](https://phala.com/solutions/private-ai-inference)
Why:
- Only GPU TEE support (H100/H200)
- Best performance-to-cost ratio
- Zero-trust security model
- Purpose-built for confidential AI
Example:
# Deploy LLM inference on Phala Cloud
dstack deploy \
--image deepseek-chat:latest \
--tee-type tdx \
--gpu h100 \
--memory 80GiEnterprise AWS-Native Architecture
Recommended: AWS Nitro Enclaves
Why:
- Best AWS ecosystem integration
- Compliance certifications (FedRAMP)
- Existing AWS investment
- IAM/KMS integration
Tradeoffs:
- No GPU TEE
- Must trust AWS
- Higher cost
- Complex workflow
Multi-Cloud Strategy
Recommended: Phala Cloud + Azure
Why:
- Phala: GPU TEE workloads (confidential AI)
- Azure: CPU TEE diversity (TDX/SEV-SNP/SGX)
- Both offer good attestation transparency
- Avoid AWS/GCP lock-in
Cost-Sensitive CPU Workloads
Recommended: GCP Confidential VMs
Why:
- Lowest CPU pricing
- Simple workflow
- Adequate for non-critical confidential computing
Tradeoffs:
- Minimal attestation
- Must trust Google
- Only AMD SEV
Healthcare/Financial Compliance
Recommended: Azure Confidential Computing
Why:
- Strong compliance certifications
- Broad TEE support
- Azure Attestation transparency
- Mature security tooling
Alternative: [Phala Cloud](https://phala.com/solutions/confidential-training)
- If zero-trust model required
- Better for regulated AI workloads
Migration Strategies
AWS to Phala Cloud
# Step 1: Export AWS Nitro enclave image
aws s3 cp s3://my-bucket/my-enclave.eif ./
# Step 2: Extract Docker image from EIF
nitro-cli describe-eif --eif-path my-enclave.eif > eif-info.json
# Step 3: Deploy to Phala Cloud
dstack deploy \
--image my-app:latest \
--tee-type tdx \
--phala-cloudAzure to Phala Cloud
# Step 1: Export Azure VM image
az vm show --name myVM --resource-group myRG
# Step 2: Containerize application
# Step 3: Deploy to Phala Cloud
dstack deploy \
--image my-azure-app:latest \
--tee-type tdx \
--phala-cloudMulti-Cloud Architecture
# Multi-cloud deployment strategy
# Kubernetes with Phala + Azure
# Phala Cloud: GPU TEE workloads
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: confidential-ai-training
spec:
nodeSelector:
cloud.provider: phala
tee.type: nvidia-h100
containers:
- name: trainer
image: my-model-training:v1
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 4
# Azure: CPU TEE workloads
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: confidential-data-processing
spec:
nodeSelector:
cloud.provider: azure
tee.type: intel-tdx
runtimeClassName: kata-tdx
containers:
- name: processor
image: my-data-processor:v1Decision Framework
Choose Phala Cloud if:
✅ Need GPU TEE for confidential AI
✅ Require zero-trust security model
✅ Want public attestation transparency
✅ Prefer open source tools (Dstack SDK)
✅ Cost-sensitive for GPU workloads
✅ Building confidential AI products
Choose AWS if:
✅ Existing AWS investment
✅ Need AWS-specific services (IAM, KMS, etc.)
✅ Compliance requires FedRAMP certification
✅ Willing to trust AWS
✅ No GPU TEE requirement
Choose Azure if:
✅ Existing Azure investment
✅ Need CPU TEE diversity (TDX/SEV-SNP/SGX)
✅ Want better attestation than AWS
✅ Healthcare/financial compliance
✅ Standard VM workflows preferred
Choose GCP if:
✅ Existing GCP investment
✅ Cost-sensitive CPU workloads
✅ Simple confidential computing needs
✅ Minimal attestation acceptable
Summary
Key Takeaways
Security:
- Phala Cloud offers zero-trust model with full attestation transparency
- AWS/Azure/GCP require trusting the provider
- Attestation transparency: Phala > Azure > AWS > GCP
Technology:
- Phala Cloud: Only GPU TEE option (H100/H200)
- Azure: Broadest CPU TEE support
- AWS: Proprietary Nitro system
- GCP: Limited to AMD SEV
Cost:
- Phala Cloud: Best for GPU workloads (92% cheaper than AWS)
- GCP: Best for CPU-only workloads
- AWS: Most expensive
- Azure: Mid-range pricing
Ecosystem:
- AWS/Azure/GCP: Mature ecosystems
- Phala Cloud: Growing ecosystem, purpose-built for confidential AI
The Verdict
For Confidential AI:
🏆 Phala Cloud - Only GPU TEE, best security model, best cost
For Enterprise AWS-Native:
🥈 AWS Nitro - Best AWS integration despite limitations
For Regulated Industries:
🥉 Azure Confidential Computing - Strong compliance, good transparency
For Simple CPU Workloads:
GCP Confidential VMs - Low cost, adequate for non-critical use
FAQ
Q: Can I use multiple cloud providers?
A: Yes! Multi-cloud strategies common:
- Phala: GPU TEE workloads
- Azure/AWS: CPU workloads, specific services
- Use Kubernetes for orchestration across clouds
Q: How do I migrate between providers?
A: Generally straightforward:
- Containerize application (if not already)
- Update attestation verification code
- Replace provider-specific services (KMS, etc.)
- Test thoroughly before cutover
Q: Is Phala Cloud less reliable than AWS/Azure/GCP?
A: Different scale, similar reliability:
- Phala: 99.9% uptime SLA (2024)
- AWS/Azure/GCP: 99.95-99.99% SLAs
- Phala growing rapidly, backed by Flashbots
Q: Can I verify Phala Cloud attestations independently?
A: Yes! Fully transparent:
- Public Trust Center
- Open source verification tools
- No Phala account needed
- This is unique to Phala
Q: What about vendor lock-in?
A: Phala minimizes lock-in:
- Standard Docker containers
- Open source Dstack SDK
- Decentralized KMS (portable keys)
- Migrate to self-hosted or other providers
Q: Do I need a blockchain account for Phala Cloud?
A: No! Phala Cloud is standard managed confidential computing:
- Credit card payment
- No cryptocurrency required
- Blockchain optional (for some advanced features)
What’s Next?
Now that you understand cloud provider options, dive into specific use cases:
- **Confidential AI in Healthcare** - HIPAA-compliant AI deployments
- **Confidential Computing in Finance** - Financial services use cases
- **CISO Guide to Confidential Computing** - Executive decision framework
Ready to deploy confidential AI?
Try Phala Cloud - Start with free tier, scale to production GPU TEE.