AMD SEV vs Intel TDX vs NVIDIA GPU TEE

5 min read
AMD SEV vs Intel TDX vs NVIDIA GPU TEE

Comparing TEE Technologies: AMD SEV vs Intel TDX vs ARM CCA vs NVIDIA GPU TEE

Meta Description: In-depth comparison of TEE technologies - AMD SEV-SNP, Intel TDX, ARM CCA, and NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE. Learn which confidential computing technology fits your use case.

Target Keywords: TEE comparison, AMD SEV vs Intel TDX, GPU TEE comparison, confidential computing technologies, TEE benchmark

Reading Time: 20 minutes

TL;DR - TEE Technology Comparison

Quick Recommendations:

Your Use CaseBest TEE TechnologyPlatform
General Web AppsAMD SEV-SNPPhala Cloud, Google Cloud, Azure
AI/ML WorkloadsNVIDIA H100 GPU TEEPhala Cloud
Highest MaturityIntel TDXGoogle Cloud, Azure, Phala Cloud
Mobile/EdgeARM CCAEdge devices, smartphones (2025+)
Cost-OptimizedAMD SEV-SNPBest price/performance
Maximum SecurityIntel TDXSmallest attack surface

Key Insight: All modern TEE technologies provide strong hardware-based isolation. Choose based on workload type (CPU vs GPU), platform availability, and performance requirements rather than security alone.

Understanding TEE Architectures

What All TEEs Have in Common

Every Trusted Execution Environment provides:

  • Hardware-Enforced Isolation: CPU/GPU prevents unauthorized access to protected memory
  • Memory Encryption: Data encrypted in RAM, decrypted only inside TEE
  • Remote [Attestation](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/attestation/overview): Cryptographic proof of TEE integrity
  • Minimal TCB: Small trusted computing base reduces attack surface

How TEEs Differ

TEE technologies vary in:

  • Isolation Granularity: VM-level (SEV, TDX) vs process-level (SGX) vs GPU-level (H100)
  • Performance Overhead: 2-15% depending on technology and workload
  • Platform Support: Cloud availability, hardware requirements
  • Maturity: Years in production, ecosystem tools

AMD SEV-SNP (Secure Encrypted Virtualization)

Overview

What It Is: VM-level memory encryption for AMD EPYC processors (3rd Gen+)

Architecture:

How It Works:

  • AMD Secure Processor (PSP): Manages encryption keys
  • Memory Encryption: AES-128-GCM encryption at memory controller
  • SNP (Secure Nested Paging): Protects against memory remapping attacks
  • VM-Specific Keys: Each VM gets a unique encryption key

Technical Specifications

FeatureAMD SEVAMD SEV-ESAMD SEV-SNP
Memory Encryption✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes
Register Encryption❌ No✅ Yes✅ Yes
Integrity Protection❌ No❌ No✅ Yes
Max VMs per Socket509509509
Encryption AlgorithmAES-128AES-128AES-128-GCM
Processor RequirementEPYC 7002+EPYC 7002+EPYC 7003+ (Milan)
AttestationBasicBasicFull attestation report

Recommendation: Always use SEV-SNP for production workloads.

Performance

Benchmarks (AMD EPYC 7763 - Milan):

WorkloadOverhead
Nginx web server3-5%
PostgreSQL database6-9%
Redis cache4-7%
Python ML inference5-8%
Disk I/O2-4%

Optimization Tips:

  • Use sequential memory access patterns
  • Larger VMs see lower relative overhead
  • Latest EPYC Genoa (4th Gen) has 30% better encryption performance

Platform Availability

  • [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (AMD SEV-SNP)
  • Google Cloud: ✅ N2D, C2D, C3 instances
  • Azure: ✅ DCasv5, ECasv5 series
  • AWS: ⚠️ Limited (Nitro uses proprietary TEE, not standard SEV)

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • ✅ Excellent price/performance ratio
  • ✅ Wide cloud platform support
  • ✅ Mature ecosystem (5+ years in production)
  • ✅ Low overhead (3-9% typical)
  • ✅ Large VM support (up to 509 VMs per socket)

Cons:

  • ❌ Larger TCB than Intel TDX (includes guest OS)
  • ❌ No GPU TEE support (CPU only)
  • ❌ Some side-channel vulnerabilities (mitigated in SNP)

Best For: General-purpose confidential VMs, cost-sensitive deployments, web applications, databases

Intel TDX (Trust Domain Extensions)

Overview

What It Is: VM-level isolation with enhanced security for Intel Xeon 4th Gen+ (Sapphire Rapids)

Architecture:

How It Works:

  • TDX Module: Intel-provided trusted firmware enforces isolation
  • Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption (MKTME): AES-256-XTS per-TD encryption
  • Physical Address Space Isolation: Hardware prevents cross-TD access
  • Minimal TCB: Smaller attack surface than AMD SEV

Technical Specifications

FeatureIntel TDX
Memory EncryptionAES-256-XTS (MKTME)
Register Protection✅ Yes (TD state protected)
Integrity Protection✅ Yes (cryptographic)
Max TDs per SocketLimited by memory encryption keys (~15-63 depending on CPU)
Processor RequirementXeon 4th Gen (Sapphire Rapids) or newer
AttestationFull quote with Intel Attestation Service
TCB SizeSmaller than AMD SEV (excludes hypervisor)

Performance

Benchmarks (Intel Xeon 8480+ - Sapphire Rapids):

WorkloadOverhead
Nginx web server2-4%
PostgreSQL database5-8%
Redis cache3-6%
Python ML inference4-7%
Disk I/O1-3%

Key Insight: Intel TDX has slightly lower overhead than AMD SEV-SNP on memory-bound workloads due to AES-256-XTS optimization.

Platform Availability

  • [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (Intel TDX)
  • Google Cloud: ✅ C3 instances (preview/limited availability)
  • Azure: ✅ DCesv5, ECesv5 series (preview)
  • AWS: ❌ Not yet available

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • ✅ Smallest TCB (enhanced security)
  • ✅ Stronger encryption (AES-256 vs AES-128)
  • ✅ Lower overhead on some workloads
  • ✅ Better side-channel protections
  • ✅ Intel Attestation Service integration

Cons:

  • ❌ Limited cloud availability (newer technology)
  • ❌ Fewer TDs per socket than SEV (key limitation)
  • ❌ Higher cost (latest Xeon gen required)
  • ❌ No GPU TEE support (CPU only)

Best For: High-security workloads, regulated industries, applications requiring minimal TCB

ARM CCA (Confidential Compute Architecture)

Overview

What It Is: ARM’s TEE for mobile, edge, and server processors (ARMv9-A+)

Architecture:

How It Works:

  • Realms: Isolated execution environments (similar to VMs/containers)
  • Realm Management Extension (RME): Hardware enforces boundaries
  • Dynamic Memory Encryption: Per-realm encryption keys
  • Token-Based Attestation: Cryptographic proof of realm integrity

Technical Specifications

FeatureARM CCA
Memory EncryptionDynamic per-realm encryption
Isolation GranularityRealm (VM or container-level)
Processor RequirementARMv9-A (Neoverse V2+)
AttestationToken-based, hardware-signed
TCB SizeSmall (excludes normal world)
Platform SupportServer: Neoverse, Mobile: Cortex-A (2025+)

Performance

Benchmarks (ARM Neoverse V2 - estimated):

WorkloadOverhead
Nginx web server3-6%
Microservices4-7%
Edge AI inference5-10%
Mobile app processing2-5%

Note: ARM CCA is newer; benchmarks are preliminary.

Platform Availability

  • [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): 🔜 Planned for 2025
  • Google Cloud: 🔜 Preview expected 2025
  • Azure: 🔜 Evaluating
  • AWS: ❌ Not yet available
  • Edge Devices: ✅ ARM-based servers, smartphones (2025+)

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • ✅ Energy efficient (ideal for edge/mobile)
  • ✅ Flexible granularity (VM or container-level)
  • ✅ Growing ecosystem (ARM server adoption)
  • ✅ Mobile TEE support (future smartphones)

Cons:

  • ❌ Limited cloud availability (very new)
  • ❌ Sparse tooling and documentation
  • ❌ No GPU TEE support currently

Best For: Edge computing, mobile applications, energy-constrained environments (2025+)

NVIDIA H100/H200 GPU TEE (Confidential Computing)

Overview

What It Is: First GPUs with native TEE support for AI/ML workloads

Architecture:

How It Works:

  • GPU Memory Encryption: HBM encrypted with AES-256-GCM
  • Secure Boot: GPU firmware cryptographically verified
  • Encrypted PCIe: Data between CPU and GPU travels encrypted
  • Attestation: GPU generates hardware-signed attestation reports

Technical Specifications

FeatureNVIDIA H100 CCENVIDIA H200 CCE
GPU Memory (HBM)80GB141GB
Memory EncryptionAES-256-GCMAES-256-GCM
Compute Capability9.09.0
FP64 Performance60 TFLOPS67 TFLOPS
AI Performance (FP8)4 PFLOPS4.8 PFLOPS
Attestation✅ Hardware-signed✅ Hardware-signed
TEE Mode Overhead5-15%3-10% (improved)

Performance

Benchmarks (NVIDIA H100 in TEE Mode):

AI WorkloadNative SpeedTEE ModeOverhead
BERT-Large Inference100%92%8%
GPT-3 Training (batch 32)100%88%12%
Stable Diffusion100%95%5%
ResNet-50 Inference100%94%6%

[Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) Performance: Up to 99% efficiency with optimized configurations

Platform Availability

  • [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (H100/H200)
  • Google Cloud: 🔜 Preview (limited regions)
  • Azure: 🔜 Roadmap for 2025
  • AWS: ❌ Not yet available

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • ✅ Only TEE for GPU workloads
  • ✅ Near-native AI performance (95%+ efficiency)
  • ✅ Protects models + data + queries
  • ✅ Large memory (80-141GB encrypted)
  • ✅ Critical for confidential AI

Cons:

  • ❌ Limited availability (newest technology)
  • ❌ High cost ($3-5/hour typical)
  • ❌ Requires compatible CPU TEE for full protection

Best For: Confidential AI training/inference, LLM deployment, protecting proprietary AI models

Head-to-Head Comparison

Security Comparison

FeatureAMD SEV-SNPIntel TDXARM CCANVIDIA GPU TEE
Isolation LevelVMVM (TD)RealmGPU
Memory EncryptionAES-128-GCMAES-256-XTSDynamicAES-256-GCM
TCB SizeMediumSmallSmallMedium
Side-Channel ProtectionGoodExcellentGoodGood
Attestation QualityStrongStrongStrongStrong
MaturityHigh (5+ yrs)Medium (2+ yrs)Low (<1 yr)Low (<2 yrs)

Winner: Intel TDX for smallest TCB and strongest encryption; AMD SEV-SNP for battle-tested maturity

Performance Comparison

Workload TypeBest TEEOverheadPlatform
Web ServerIntel TDX2-4%Phala, GCP, Azure
DatabaseAMD SEV-SNP6-9%Phala, GCP, Azure
AI Inference (CPU)Intel TDX4-7%Phala, GCP
AI Training (GPU)NVIDIA H1005-15%Phala Cloud
Edge ComputingARM CCA3-6%Edge devices (2025)

Winner: NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE for AI; Intel TDX for general CPU workloads

Cost Comparison (Typical Cloud Pricing)

Instance TypeTEE TechnologyHourly Cost
4 vCPU, 8GB RAMAMD SEV-SNP$0.30-0.40
4 vCPU, 8GB RAMIntel TDX$0.35-0.50
8 vCPU, 64GB, 1x H100NVIDIA GPU TEE$3.50-5.00
ARM edge serverARM CCA$0.25-0.35 (est.)

Winner: AMD SEV-SNP for best price/performance on CPU workloads

Platform Availability

PlatformAMD SEV-SNPIntel TDXARM CCANVIDIA GPU TEE
[Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview)✅ Yes✅ Yes🔜 2025✅ Yes
Google Cloud✅ Yes✅ Preview🔜 2025🔜 Preview
Azure✅ Yes✅ Preview❌ No🔜 2025
AWS⚠️ Nitro only❌ No❌ No❌ No

Winner: [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) for broadest TEE support including GPU TEE

Choosing the Right TEE

Decision Tree

Use Case Recommendations

1. Confidential AI Training/Inference

  • Primary: NVIDIA H100/H200 GPU TEE on Phala Cloud
  • Secondary: Intel TDX for CPU-based inference
  • Why: Only GPU TEE can protect models and data during training

2. Healthcare Data Processing (HIPAA)

  • Primary: Intel TDX (smallest TCB for highest assurance)
  • Secondary: AMD SEV-SNP (lower cost, proven in healthcare)
  • Why: Minimal TCB reduces compliance audit scope

3. Financial Services (PCI-DSS)

  • Primary: Intel TDX or AMD SEV-SNP
  • Secondary: Combine with HSM for Key Management
  • Why: Both provide strong cryptographic compliance proof

4. General Web Applications

  • Primary: AMD SEV-SNP
  • Secondary: Intel TDX
  • Why: Best price/performance, wide cloud availability

5. Edge AI / IoT (2025+)

  • Primary: ARM CCA
  • Secondary: Intel TDX for edge servers
  • Why: Energy efficiency, mobile device support

6. Multi-Party Computation

  • Primary: Intel TDX (smallest TCB = highest mutual trust)
  • Secondary: AMD SEV-SNP (more instances per server)
  • Why: Parties trust hardware more when TCB is minimal

Migration Path

From Standard VMs to TEE

Stage 1: AMD SEV-SNP (Easiest Entry)

  • Lift-and-shift existing workloads
  • Minimal code changes
  • Lower cost
  • Wide platform support

Stage 2: Intel TDX (Enhanced Security)

  • Migrate security-critical workloads
  • Benefit from smaller TCB
  • Better side-channel protection

Stage 3: NVIDIA GPU TEE (AI Workloads)

  • Move AI/ML to confidential infrastructure
  • Protect models and training data
  • Enable confidential AI-as-a-Service

Between TEE Technologies

AMD SEV-SNP → Intel TDX Migration:

  1. Test workload on Intel TDX instance (cloud provider trial)
  2. Compare performance benchmarks (typically similar or better than SEV-SNP)
  3. Update attestation verification logic to expect TDX measurements instead of SEV-SNP
  4. Perform blue-green deployment strategy to minimize downtime

CPU TEE → GPU TEE Migration (for AI workloads):

  1. Containerize existing AI workload (Docker/Kubernetes)
  2. Deploy to GPU TEE platform (Phala Cloud, Azure DCasv5 with GPU)
  3. Add GPU-specific attestation verification
  4. Benchmark performance (expect 5-15% TEE overhead, but 10-100× speedup vs CPU for AI)

Future Outlook

2025-2026 Predictions

AMD:

  • EPYC 5th Gen (Turin) with improved SEV-SNP performance
  • <2% overhead target
  • Better side-channel mitigations

Intel:

  • Xeon 6th Gen with enhanced TDX
  • More TDs per socket
  • GPU TEE collaboration

ARM:

  • Widespread ARM CCA in servers and smartphones
  • Confidential mobile apps
  • Edge AI with TEE

NVIDIA:

  • H200, B100 with improved GPU TEE (1-5% overhead)
  • Multi-GPU TEE coordination
  • AI accelerator TEE standardization

Convergence

By 2026, expect:

  • Unified attestation formats (verify any TEE with one SDK)
  • Cross-TEE federation (AMD CPU + NVIDIA GPU seamlessly)
  • TEE by default (all cloud VMs confidential, no extra cost)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which TEE is most secure?

Intel TDX has the smallest TCB and strongest encryption (AES-256), making it technically most secure. However, all modern TEEs (SEV-SNP, TDX, GPU TEE) provide strong practical security. Choose based on threat model and workload.

Can I mix TEE technologies?

Yes! Example: AMD SEV-SNP CPU + NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE (both in same system, both protecting data). This is common for confidential AI workloads on Phala Cloud.

Is AMD SEV-SNP “insecure” because it uses AES-128?

No. AES-128 is still considered unbreakable (128-bit key = 2^128 possibilities). Intel TDX’s AES-256 provides theoretical extra margin, but both are cryptographically strong.

Which has better performance?

Intel TDX typically has 1-2% lower overhead on memory-bound workloads. AMD SEV-SNP scales better (more VMs per socket). NVIDIA GPU TEE is 10-100x faster than CPU for AI, despite 5-15% TEE overhead.

Which should I use for production?

  • AI workloads: NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE (Phala Cloud)
  • General production: AMD SEV-SNP (proven, widely available)
  • High security: Intel TDX (smallest TCB)
  • Cost-sensitive: AMD SEV-SNP (best price/performance)

Can I switch TEE technologies later?

Yes, but requires:

  1. Redeploy on new TEE-enabled instances
  2. Update attestation verification code (expect different measurements)
  3. Test performance and functionality

Most applications are TEE-agnostic (same Docker container works on SEV, TDX, or GPU TEE).

Conclusion

All modern TEE technologies provide strong confidential computing:

  • AMD SEV-SNP: Best price/performance, proven in production
  • Intel TDX: Smallest TCB, enhanced security features
  • ARM CCA: Future of edge and mobile confidential computing
  • NVIDIA GPU TEE: Only solution for confidential AI at scale

Choose based on workload type, not abstract “security” comparisons. For AI, GPU TEE is mandatory. For general workloads, AMD SEV-SNP and Intel TDX are both excellent.

[Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) offers all major TEE technologies, making it easy to test and choose the best fit for your needs.


Next Steps

Recent Articles

Related Articles