
Comparing TEE Technologies: AMD SEV vs Intel TDX vs ARM CCA vs NVIDIA GPU TEE
Meta Description: In-depth comparison of TEE technologies - AMD SEV-SNP, Intel TDX, ARM CCA, and NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE. Learn which confidential computing technology fits your use case.
Target Keywords: TEE comparison, AMD SEV vs Intel TDX, GPU TEE comparison, confidential computing technologies, TEE benchmark
Reading Time: 20 minutes
TL;DR - TEE Technology Comparison
Quick Recommendations:
| Your Use Case | Best TEE Technology | Platform |
| General Web Apps | AMD SEV-SNP | Phala Cloud, Google Cloud, Azure |
| AI/ML Workloads | NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE | Phala Cloud |
| Highest Maturity | Intel TDX | Google Cloud, Azure, Phala Cloud |
| Mobile/Edge | ARM CCA | Edge devices, smartphones (2025+) |
| Cost-Optimized | AMD SEV-SNP | Best price/performance |
| Maximum Security | Intel TDX | Smallest attack surface |
Key Insight: All modern TEE technologies provide strong hardware-based isolation. Choose based on workload type (CPU vs GPU), platform availability, and performance requirements rather than security alone.
Understanding TEE Architectures
What All TEEs Have in Common
Every Trusted Execution Environment provides:
- Hardware-Enforced Isolation: CPU/GPU prevents unauthorized access to protected memory
- Memory Encryption: Data encrypted in RAM, decrypted only inside TEE
- Remote [Attestation](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/attestation/overview): Cryptographic proof of TEE integrity
- Minimal TCB: Small trusted computing base reduces attack surface
How TEEs Differ
TEE technologies vary in:
- Isolation Granularity: VM-level (SEV, TDX) vs process-level (SGX) vs GPU-level (H100)
- Performance Overhead: 2-15% depending on technology and workload
- Platform Support: Cloud availability, hardware requirements
- Maturity: Years in production, ecosystem tools
AMD SEV-SNP (Secure Encrypted Virtualization)
Overview
What It Is: VM-level memory encryption for AMD EPYC processors (3rd Gen+)
Architecture:
How It Works:
- AMD Secure Processor (PSP): Manages encryption keys
- Memory Encryption: AES-128-GCM encryption at memory controller
- SNP (Secure Nested Paging): Protects against memory remapping attacks
- VM-Specific Keys: Each VM gets a unique encryption key
Technical Specifications
| Feature | AMD SEV | AMD SEV-ES | AMD SEV-SNP |
| Memory Encryption | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Register Encryption | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Integrity Protection | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Max VMs per Socket | 509 | 509 | 509 |
| Encryption Algorithm | AES-128 | AES-128 | AES-128-GCM |
| Processor Requirement | EPYC 7002+ | EPYC 7002+ | EPYC 7003+ (Milan) |
| Attestation | Basic | Basic | Full attestation report |
Recommendation: Always use SEV-SNP for production workloads.
Performance
Benchmarks (AMD EPYC 7763 - Milan):
| Workload | Overhead |
| Nginx web server | 3-5% |
| PostgreSQL database | 6-9% |
| Redis cache | 4-7% |
| Python ML inference | 5-8% |
| Disk I/O | 2-4% |
Optimization Tips:
- Use sequential memory access patterns
- Larger VMs see lower relative overhead
- Latest EPYC Genoa (4th Gen) has 30% better encryption performance
Platform Availability
- [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (AMD SEV-SNP)
- Google Cloud: ✅ N2D, C2D, C3 instances
- Azure: ✅ DCasv5, ECasv5 series
- AWS: ⚠️ Limited (Nitro uses proprietary TEE, not standard SEV)
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- ✅ Excellent price/performance ratio
- ✅ Wide cloud platform support
- ✅ Mature ecosystem (5+ years in production)
- ✅ Low overhead (3-9% typical)
- ✅ Large VM support (up to 509 VMs per socket)
Cons:
- ❌ Larger TCB than Intel TDX (includes guest OS)
- ❌ No GPU TEE support (CPU only)
- ❌ Some side-channel vulnerabilities (mitigated in SNP)
Best For: General-purpose confidential VMs, cost-sensitive deployments, web applications, databases
Intel TDX (Trust Domain Extensions)
Overview
What It Is: VM-level isolation with enhanced security for Intel Xeon 4th Gen+ (Sapphire Rapids)
Architecture:
How It Works:
- TDX Module: Intel-provided trusted firmware enforces isolation
- Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption (MKTME): AES-256-XTS per-TD encryption
- Physical Address Space Isolation: Hardware prevents cross-TD access
- Minimal TCB: Smaller attack surface than AMD SEV
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Intel TDX |
| Memory Encryption | AES-256-XTS (MKTME) |
| Register Protection | ✅ Yes (TD state protected) |
| Integrity Protection | ✅ Yes (cryptographic) |
| Max TDs per Socket | Limited by memory encryption keys (~15-63 depending on CPU) |
| Processor Requirement | Xeon 4th Gen (Sapphire Rapids) or newer |
| Attestation | Full quote with Intel Attestation Service |
| TCB Size | Smaller than AMD SEV (excludes hypervisor) |
Performance
Benchmarks (Intel Xeon 8480+ - Sapphire Rapids):
| Workload | Overhead |
| Nginx web server | 2-4% |
| PostgreSQL database | 5-8% |
| Redis cache | 3-6% |
| Python ML inference | 4-7% |
| Disk I/O | 1-3% |
Key Insight: Intel TDX has slightly lower overhead than AMD SEV-SNP on memory-bound workloads due to AES-256-XTS optimization.
Platform Availability
- [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (Intel TDX)
- Google Cloud: ✅ C3 instances (preview/limited availability)
- Azure: ✅ DCesv5, ECesv5 series (preview)
- AWS: ❌ Not yet available
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- ✅ Smallest TCB (enhanced security)
- ✅ Stronger encryption (AES-256 vs AES-128)
- ✅ Lower overhead on some workloads
- ✅ Better side-channel protections
- ✅ Intel Attestation Service integration
Cons:
- ❌ Limited cloud availability (newer technology)
- ❌ Fewer TDs per socket than SEV (key limitation)
- ❌ Higher cost (latest Xeon gen required)
- ❌ No GPU TEE support (CPU only)
Best For: High-security workloads, regulated industries, applications requiring minimal TCB
ARM CCA (Confidential Compute Architecture)
Overview
What It Is: ARM’s TEE for mobile, edge, and server processors (ARMv9-A+)
Architecture:
How It Works:
- Realms: Isolated execution environments (similar to VMs/containers)
- Realm Management Extension (RME): Hardware enforces boundaries
- Dynamic Memory Encryption: Per-realm encryption keys
- Token-Based Attestation: Cryptographic proof of realm integrity
Technical Specifications
| Feature | ARM CCA |
| Memory Encryption | Dynamic per-realm encryption |
| Isolation Granularity | Realm (VM or container-level) |
| Processor Requirement | ARMv9-A (Neoverse V2+) |
| Attestation | Token-based, hardware-signed |
| TCB Size | Small (excludes normal world) |
| Platform Support | Server: Neoverse, Mobile: Cortex-A (2025+) |
Performance
Benchmarks (ARM Neoverse V2 - estimated):
| Workload | Overhead |
| Nginx web server | 3-6% |
| Microservices | 4-7% |
| Edge AI inference | 5-10% |
| Mobile app processing | 2-5% |
Note: ARM CCA is newer; benchmarks are preliminary.
Platform Availability
- [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): 🔜 Planned for 2025
- Google Cloud: 🔜 Preview expected 2025
- Azure: 🔜 Evaluating
- AWS: ❌ Not yet available
- Edge Devices: ✅ ARM-based servers, smartphones (2025+)
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- ✅ Energy efficient (ideal for edge/mobile)
- ✅ Flexible granularity (VM or container-level)
- ✅ Growing ecosystem (ARM server adoption)
- ✅ Mobile TEE support (future smartphones)
Cons:
- ❌ Limited cloud availability (very new)
- ❌ Sparse tooling and documentation
- ❌ No GPU TEE support currently
Best For: Edge computing, mobile applications, energy-constrained environments (2025+)
NVIDIA H100/H200 GPU TEE (Confidential Computing)
Overview
What It Is: First GPUs with native TEE support for AI/ML workloads
Architecture:
How It Works:
- GPU Memory Encryption: HBM encrypted with AES-256-GCM
- Secure Boot: GPU firmware cryptographically verified
- Encrypted PCIe: Data between CPU and GPU travels encrypted
- Attestation: GPU generates hardware-signed attestation reports
Technical Specifications
| Feature | NVIDIA H100 CCE | NVIDIA H200 CCE |
| GPU Memory (HBM) | 80GB | 141GB |
| Memory Encryption | AES-256-GCM | AES-256-GCM |
| Compute Capability | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| FP64 Performance | 60 TFLOPS | 67 TFLOPS |
| AI Performance (FP8) | 4 PFLOPS | 4.8 PFLOPS |
| Attestation | ✅ Hardware-signed | ✅ Hardware-signed |
| TEE Mode Overhead | 5-15% | 3-10% (improved) |
Performance
Benchmarks (NVIDIA H100 in TEE Mode):
| AI Workload | Native Speed | TEE Mode | Overhead |
| BERT-Large Inference | 100% | 92% | 8% |
| GPT-3 Training (batch 32) | 100% | 88% | 12% |
| Stable Diffusion | 100% | 95% | 5% |
| ResNet-50 Inference | 100% | 94% | 6% |
[Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) Performance: Up to 99% efficiency with optimized configurations
Platform Availability
- [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview): ✅ Full support (H100/H200)
- Google Cloud: 🔜 Preview (limited regions)
- Azure: 🔜 Roadmap for 2025
- AWS: ❌ Not yet available
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- ✅ Only TEE for GPU workloads
- ✅ Near-native AI performance (95%+ efficiency)
- ✅ Protects models + data + queries
- ✅ Large memory (80-141GB encrypted)
- ✅ Critical for confidential AI
Cons:
- ❌ Limited availability (newest technology)
- ❌ High cost ($3-5/hour typical)
- ❌ Requires compatible CPU TEE for full protection
Best For: Confidential AI training/inference, LLM deployment, protecting proprietary AI models
Head-to-Head Comparison
Security Comparison
| Feature | AMD SEV-SNP | Intel TDX | ARM CCA | NVIDIA GPU TEE |
| Isolation Level | VM | VM (TD) | Realm | GPU |
| Memory Encryption | AES-128-GCM | AES-256-XTS | Dynamic | AES-256-GCM |
| TCB Size | Medium | Small | Small | Medium |
| Side-Channel Protection | Good | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Attestation Quality | Strong | Strong | Strong | Strong |
| Maturity | High (5+ yrs) | Medium (2+ yrs) | Low (<1 yr) | Low (<2 yrs) |
Winner: Intel TDX for smallest TCB and strongest encryption; AMD SEV-SNP for battle-tested maturity
Performance Comparison
| Workload Type | Best TEE | Overhead | Platform |
| Web Server | Intel TDX | 2-4% | Phala, GCP, Azure |
| Database | AMD SEV-SNP | 6-9% | Phala, GCP, Azure |
| AI Inference (CPU) | Intel TDX | 4-7% | Phala, GCP |
| AI Training (GPU) | NVIDIA H100 | 5-15% | Phala Cloud |
| Edge Computing | ARM CCA | 3-6% | Edge devices (2025) |
Winner: NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE for AI; Intel TDX for general CPU workloads
Cost Comparison (Typical Cloud Pricing)
| Instance Type | TEE Technology | Hourly Cost |
| 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM | AMD SEV-SNP | $0.30-0.40 |
| 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM | Intel TDX | $0.35-0.50 |
| 8 vCPU, 64GB, 1x H100 | NVIDIA GPU TEE | $3.50-5.00 |
| ARM edge server | ARM CCA | $0.25-0.35 (est.) |
Winner: AMD SEV-SNP for best price/performance on CPU workloads
Platform Availability
| Platform | AMD SEV-SNP | Intel TDX | ARM CCA | NVIDIA GPU TEE |
| [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | 🔜 2025 | ✅ Yes |
| Google Cloud | ✅ Yes | ✅ Preview | 🔜 2025 | 🔜 Preview |
| Azure | ✅ Yes | ✅ Preview | ❌ No | 🔜 2025 |
| AWS | ⚠️ Nitro only | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Winner: [Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) for broadest TEE support including GPU TEE
Choosing the Right TEE
Decision Tree
Use Case Recommendations
1. Confidential AI Training/Inference
- Primary: NVIDIA H100/H200 GPU TEE on Phala Cloud
- Secondary: Intel TDX for CPU-based inference
- Why: Only GPU TEE can protect models and data during training
2. Healthcare Data Processing (HIPAA)
- Primary: Intel TDX (smallest TCB for highest assurance)
- Secondary: AMD SEV-SNP (lower cost, proven in healthcare)
- Why: Minimal TCB reduces compliance audit scope
3. Financial Services (PCI-DSS)
- Primary: Intel TDX or AMD SEV-SNP
- Secondary: Combine with HSM for Key Management
- Why: Both provide strong cryptographic compliance proof
4. General Web Applications
- Primary: AMD SEV-SNP
- Secondary: Intel TDX
- Why: Best price/performance, wide cloud availability
5. Edge AI / IoT (2025+)
- Primary: ARM CCA
- Secondary: Intel TDX for edge servers
- Why: Energy efficiency, mobile device support
6. Multi-Party Computation
- Primary: Intel TDX (smallest TCB = highest mutual trust)
- Secondary: AMD SEV-SNP (more instances per server)
- Why: Parties trust hardware more when TCB is minimal
Migration Path
From Standard VMs to TEE
Stage 1: AMD SEV-SNP (Easiest Entry)
- Lift-and-shift existing workloads
- Minimal code changes
- Lower cost
- Wide platform support
Stage 2: Intel TDX (Enhanced Security)
- Migrate security-critical workloads
- Benefit from smaller TCB
- Better side-channel protection
Stage 3: NVIDIA GPU TEE (AI Workloads)
- Move AI/ML to confidential infrastructure
- Protect models and training data
- Enable confidential AI-as-a-Service
Between TEE Technologies
AMD SEV-SNP → Intel TDX Migration:
- Test workload on Intel TDX instance (cloud provider trial)
- Compare performance benchmarks (typically similar or better than SEV-SNP)
- Update attestation verification logic to expect TDX measurements instead of SEV-SNP
- Perform blue-green deployment strategy to minimize downtime
CPU TEE → GPU TEE Migration (for AI workloads):
- Containerize existing AI workload (Docker/Kubernetes)
- Deploy to GPU TEE platform (Phala Cloud, Azure DCasv5 with GPU)
- Add GPU-specific attestation verification
- Benchmark performance (expect 5-15% TEE overhead, but 10-100× speedup vs CPU for AI)
Future Outlook
2025-2026 Predictions
AMD:
- EPYC 5th Gen (Turin) with improved SEV-SNP performance
- <2% overhead target
- Better side-channel mitigations
Intel:
- Xeon 6th Gen with enhanced TDX
- More TDs per socket
- GPU TEE collaboration
ARM:
- Widespread ARM CCA in servers and smartphones
- Confidential mobile apps
- Edge AI with TEE
NVIDIA:
- H200, B100 with improved GPU TEE (1-5% overhead)
- Multi-GPU TEE coordination
- AI accelerator TEE standardization
Convergence
By 2026, expect:
- Unified attestation formats (verify any TEE with one SDK)
- Cross-TEE federation (AMD CPU + NVIDIA GPU seamlessly)
- TEE by default (all cloud VMs confidential, no extra cost)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which TEE is most secure?
Intel TDX has the smallest TCB and strongest encryption (AES-256), making it technically most secure. However, all modern TEEs (SEV-SNP, TDX, GPU TEE) provide strong practical security. Choose based on threat model and workload.
Can I mix TEE technologies?
Yes! Example: AMD SEV-SNP CPU + NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE (both in same system, both protecting data). This is common for confidential AI workloads on Phala Cloud.
Is AMD SEV-SNP “insecure” because it uses AES-128?
No. AES-128 is still considered unbreakable (128-bit key = 2^128 possibilities). Intel TDX’s AES-256 provides theoretical extra margin, but both are cryptographically strong.
Which has better performance?
Intel TDX typically has 1-2% lower overhead on memory-bound workloads. AMD SEV-SNP scales better (more VMs per socket). NVIDIA GPU TEE is 10-100x faster than CPU for AI, despite 5-15% TEE overhead.
Which should I use for production?
- AI workloads: NVIDIA H100 GPU TEE (Phala Cloud)
- General production: AMD SEV-SNP (proven, widely available)
- High security: Intel TDX (smallest TCB)
- Cost-sensitive: AMD SEV-SNP (best price/performance)
Can I switch TEE technologies later?
Yes, but requires:
- Redeploy on new TEE-enabled instances
- Update attestation verification code (expect different measurements)
- Test performance and functionality
Most applications are TEE-agnostic (same Docker container works on SEV, TDX, or GPU TEE).
Conclusion
All modern TEE technologies provide strong confidential computing:
- AMD SEV-SNP: Best price/performance, proven in production
- Intel TDX: Smallest TCB, enhanced security features
- ARM CCA: Future of edge and mobile confidential computing
- NVIDIA GPU TEE: Only solution for confidential AI at scale
Choose based on workload type, not abstract “security” comparisons. For AI, GPU TEE is mandatory. For general workloads, AMD SEV-SNP and Intel TDX are both excellent.
[Phala Cloud](https://docs.phala.com/phala-cloud/getting-started/overview) offers all major TEE technologies, making it easy to test and choose the best fit for your needs.